The Allied Peoples Movement (APM) has accused President Bola Tinubu’s administration of using allocations to regional development commissions as a tool to build political support ahead of the 2027 general election. The party argued that the timing and pattern of funding decisions raise concerns about whether public resources are being deployed for political advantage.
According to the opposition party, funds meant for regional development should be used strictly for addressing infrastructure deficits, economic growth, and social challenges across the country rather than becoming part of electoral calculations. The APM claimed that recent government actions suggest an attempt to strengthen political influence in key regions before the next election.
The allegations form part of a broader exchange between the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and opposition parties as political activities surrounding the 2027 presidential election continue to gather momentum. Opposition groups have increasingly scrutinised government policies and appointments, while the administration maintains that its programmes are designed to deliver development and economic benefits to Nigerians.
APM officials argued that public institutions and development agencies should remain focused on their statutory responsibilities and avoid becoming entangled in partisan politics. The party also reiterated its intention to challenge the ruling party in the 2027 elections through its own political platform and candidate.
The Federal Government has consistently defended its development initiatives, describing them as part of wider efforts to improve infrastructure, stimulate economic activity, and support underserved regions. Government officials have not publicly accepted the opposition’s claims that regional funding decisions are linked to electoral objectives.
As preparations for the 2027 elections gradually intensify, debates over public spending, governance priorities, and political influence are expected to remain central issues in Nigeria’s political landscape. The allegations by the APM add another layer to the growing conversation around accountability and the use of public resources ahead of the next electoral cycle.
